SiteSucker for Mac
Automatically downloads complete Web sites.
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission
SiteSucker overview
SiteSucker is an application that automatically downloads Web sites from the Internet. It does this by copying the site's HTML documents, images, backgrounds, movies, and other files to your local hard drive. Just enter a URL and click a button and SiteSucker can download the entire site.
SiteSucker can be used to make local copies of your Web sites for easy maintenance. SiteSucker can download files unmodified, or it can "localize" the files it downloads, allowing you to browse a site off-line.
What’s new in version 5.5
- Updated SiteSucker for macOS 15 Sequoia.
- Added a Delay Range setting that allows the user to randomize the Delay setting.
- Modified localization code to give other connections some processing time.
SiteSucker for Mac
$4.99
In English
Version 5.5
Write a detailed review about SiteSucker
(117 Reviews of SiteSucker)
Comments
User Ratings
Mar 31 2024
Version: 5.3.1
Very good and very useful! Have been using this for many years. Buy it!
Nov 10 2023
Version: 5.1.12
SiteSucker Pro, $5.99, is a more elaborated version of the app (beyond what Apple allows in the Mac App Store). Download it directly from the Dev site. It has a 13 day trial. "SiteSucker Pro is an enhanced version of SiteSucker that can download embedded videos, including embedded YouTube, Vimeo, and Wistia videos. SiteSucker Pro can also download sites from the Tor network."
Nov 10 2023
Version: 5.1.12
v5.1.13 is out. Release Notes: "Fixed some problems localizing files. Fixed a bug that allowed the SiteSucker browser to save a file without a file extension."
Jan 16 2023
Version: 5.1.1
Great product and does exactly what it's supposed to do. One feature I would even pay more for the product is if it could pull websites from archive.org.
If find myself running into this scenario about once a quarter with clients and having to use command line tools that seem to break more than not, gets frustrating.
Please consider adding Archive.org support!
